Banks participating in reciprocal deposit networks have new federal rules to follow after the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation implemented changes Congress made to how certain deposits are treated under banking regulations. The FDIC’s interim final rule took effect September 1 and implements Section 902 of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, which became law on July 11, 2026. The change primarily affects banks and their compliance teams rather than requiring customers to take immediate action. However, reciprocal deposits are an important tool that some banks use to help customers obtain FDIC insurance coverage for deposits exceeding the standard insurance limit at a single institution.
What Are Reciprocal Deposits?
A reciprocal deposit arrangement can allow a customer to place a large amount of money with one participating bank while portions of those funds are placed at other participating insured institutions. In return, the original bank receives deposits placed through the network by other institutions.
The arrangement can allow a customer to maintain a relationship with one bank while potentially receiving FDIC insurance coverage across multiple institutions, subject to applicable insurance rules and program terms. That’s particularly useful for businesses, municipalities and individuals holding deposits that exceed the standard FDIC insurance limit. The regulatory question for banks is whether those reciprocal deposits must be classified as “brokered deposits.” Federal law places additional restrictions and regulatory requirements on brokered deposits, particularly when an institution’s financial condition deteriorates.
The New Law Raises the Reciprocal Deposit Cap
Congress changed the reciprocal-deposit framework when the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act became law this summer. Under the new law and the FDIC’s implementing rule, qualifying “agent institutions” can exclude a larger amount of reciprocal deposits from being classified as brokered deposits. The new general cap uses a tiered calculation based on an institution’s total liabilities.
For the first $1 billion in liabilities, the calculation uses 50%. For liabilities above $1 billion and up to $10 billion, it adds 40% of that portion. For liabilities exceeding $10 billion, it adds 30% of that portion. The resulting general cap cannot exceed $30 billion.
That replaces the previous framework under which the general cap was generally the lesser of $5 billion or 20% of the institution’s total liabilities.
More Banks May Qualify as “Agent Institutions”
The rule also changes which banks can qualify for the reciprocal-deposit exception. Previously, an institution generally needed to be well capitalized and have a composite condition rating of 1 or 2 under the applicable supervisory rating system, among other potential ways to qualify.
The new law expands the definition to include institutions that are well capitalized and have a composite rating of 3. That change could allow additional institutions to make use of the reciprocal-deposit exception.
The FDIC’s rule also clarifies how institutions can requalify as agent institutions after circumstances change, such as a supervisory rating change, capital-category change, approval of a brokered-deposit waiver or reduction in reciprocal deposits below the applicable special cap.
What Does This Mean for Bank Customers?
For most consumers with ordinary checking and savings balances, the rule doesn’t require any immediate action. Its more direct impact is on financial institutions that participate in reciprocal-deposit networks and on customers with larger balances who use those services. Reciprocal-deposit networks can allow banks to retain relationships with customers whose deposits exceed the standard FDIC insurance limit by placing portions of the money with other participating insured institutions.
Customers shouldn’t assume, however, that simply participating in a reciprocal-deposit program automatically makes every dollar in every situation FDIC-insured. Deposit insurance depends on factors including account ownership category, how funds are placed and the institutions where deposits ultimately reside. Customers with large balances should review their specific arrangement and deposit-insurance coverage with their bank.
The FDIC Is Still Accepting Comments
Although the rule took effect September 1, it is an interim final rule, and the FDIC is requesting public comments. Comments must be received by October 1, 2026. The Federal Register notice says comments should reference RIN 3064-AG32 and can be submitted through the FDIC’s Federal Register publications page, by email or by mail.
The FDIC also says it will work with the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council to update bank Call Report instructions to reflect the statutory and regulatory changes.
For financial institutions using reciprocal-deposit networks, the September rule means compliance procedures and deposit classifications may need to be revisited. For ordinary depositors, the more important takeaway is understanding why these networks exist in the first place: they can allow qualifying customers to spread large deposits among multiple insured banks while continuing to work primarily through one institution.
What to Read Next
FDIC Publishes 2026 Risk Review Covering Funding, Interest Rate, and Credit Risks Facing Banks
7 FDIC Coverage Rules Couples Should Recheck Before Opening Trust or Joint Accounts
How Many CDs Can You Have at One Bank? What FDIC Rules Actually Allow
Amanda Blankenship is the Chief Editor for District Media. With a BA in journalism from Wingate University, she frequently writes for a handful of websites and loves to share her own personal finance story with others. When she isn’t typing away at her desk, she enjoys spending time with her daughter, son, husband, and dog. During her free time, you’re likely to find her with her nose in a book, hiking, or playing RPG video games.