• Home
  • About Us
  • Getting Finances Done
    • Hiring Advisors
    • Debt Management
    • Spending Plan
  • Insurance
    • Life Insurance
    • Health Insurance
    • Disability Insurance
    • Homeowners/Renters Insurance
  • Contact Us
  • Our Editorial Commitment

The Free Financial Advisor

You are here: Home / Archives for Community Banks

Federal Regulators Double Bank Asset Threshold for 18-Month Examination Cycle to $6 Billion

September 14, 2026 by Amanda Blankenship Leave a Comment

18-month bank examination cycle
Federal banking regulators have raised the asset threshold from $3 billion to $6 billion for certain qualifying institutions to use an 18-month on-site examination cycle instead of the standard 12-month schedule. dennizn/Shutterstock

Some community banks may now go six additional months between regularly scheduled federal on-site examinations after regulators doubled the asset threshold for institutions eligible for an extended examination cycle.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Reserve Board and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation have issued an interim final rule raising the threshold from $3 billion to $6 billion in total assets.

The change took effect September 14, 2026, and implements a provision of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act.

For bank customers, the important distinction is that the rule doesn’t eliminate federal oversight or automatically give every bank below $6 billion an 18-month examination schedule. The longer cycle is intended for qualifying institutions with relatively low-risk profiles that meet additional supervisory requirements.

What Changed for Community Banks

Federal law generally requires insured depository institutions to receive a full-scope, on-site examination at least once every 12 months.

Certain smaller institutions that satisfy additional requirements, however, can qualify for an examination every 18 months instead.

Until this change, the relevant asset ceiling was $3 billion. The new rule raises that threshold to less than $6 billion, potentially allowing more community banks to use the extended schedule.

According to the OCC, approximately 50 additional OCC-regulated institutions are expected to become eligible for the 18-month examination cycle because of the higher threshold.

The Federal Reserve, FDIC and OCC said extending the examination cycle can reduce the time and resources low-risk institutions devote to the examination process.

A Bank Doesn’t Qualify Based on Size Alone

A bank having $5 billion in assets doesn’t automatically mean federal examiners will visit only once every 18 months.

Federal regulators emphasize that institutions must satisfy qualifying criteria for the extended examination schedule. Those requirements include being considered well capitalized and well managed.

The rule is designed for smaller institutions with relatively low-risk profiles rather than giving every bank under the new asset ceiling an automatic six-month extension.

Regulators also aren’t going completely hands-off during the longer interval.

The agencies said they will continue their existing practice of off-site monitoring between scheduled examinations for institutions using the extended cycle.

That distinction matters for depositors who might see the phrase “fewer bank examinations” and assume federal oversight is disappearing. The change affects the normal schedule for qualifying full-scope on-site examinations; it doesn’t mean regulators stop monitoring a bank for 18 months.

Why Regulators Say the Change Is Needed

Federal regulators describe the rule as a way to reduce unnecessary regulatory burden on community banks that have already demonstrated stronger financial and managerial characteristics.

A full bank examination can require significant staff time and resources as examiners evaluate areas including financial condition, management, risk controls and compliance with applicable laws.

Moving a qualifying institution from a 12-month to an 18-month cycle gives it another six months between those regularly scheduled examinations.

The agencies argue that this is appropriate for smaller, well-managed and well-capitalized institutions with lower-risk profiles.

OCC officials have also framed the change as part of a broader effort to tailor supervision to the size, complexity and risk of community banks rather than applying the same regulatory burden to every institution.

U.S. Operations of Some Foreign Banks Are Included Too

The rule isn’t limited to domestic community banks.

The OCC, Federal Reserve and FDIC are also making corresponding changes to regulations governing the examination cycles of qualifying U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks.

Those changes are being made consistent with requirements under the International Banking Act of 1978.

As with domestic institutions, meeting the asset threshold alone doesn’t necessarily establish eligibility for the longer examination cycle. The applicable regulatory requirements still have to be satisfied.

What Does This Mean for Bank Customers?

For the typical checking or savings account customer, there is no immediate action to take.

The rule doesn’t change the balance in an account, the interest rate a bank pays or the basic way customers access their money.

It also doesn’t change the standard FDIC deposit insurance amount. At an FDIC-insured bank, deposits are generally automatically insured to at least $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank, for each account ownership category.

Instead, this is primarily a change in how frequently certain qualifying banks undergo their regularly scheduled full-scope federal on-site examinations.

Customers concerned about the financial condition of a bank can still verify whether an institution is FDIC insured and review publicly available information about it rather than attempting to determine safety based solely on whether its normal examination cycle is 12 or 18 months.

The Rule Is Already in Effect, but Regulators Want Comments

The agencies issued the change as an interim final rule, which means it took effect upon publication while regulators are still accepting public comments.

The Federal Reserve identifies the proposal as Docket No. R-1898, while OCC materials identify Docket ID OCC-2026-0761.

Comments are being accepted for 30 days following publication in the Federal Register.

The immediate takeaway for consumers is fairly limited: some additional community banks that satisfy federal safety, management and other qualifying standards can now move from annual on-site examinations to an 18-month schedule.

For the banks themselves, however, regulators say those additional six months can reduce examination-related time and costs while off-site supervision continues between scheduled exams.

What to Read Next

What Actually Happens to the Money in Your Bank Account When You Die?

Why Banks Sometimes Close Accounts Without Warning

You Can Pay the IRS Directly From Your Bank Account for Free—No Registration Required

Headshot of Amanda Blankenship
Amanda Blankenship

Amanda Blankenship is the Chief Editor for District Media.  With a BA in journalism from Wingate University, she frequently writes for a handful of websites and loves to share her own personal finance story with others. When she isn’t typing away at her desk, she enjoys spending time with her daughter, son, husband, and dog. During her free time, you’re likely to find her with her nose in a book, hiking, or playing RPG video games.

Filed Under: news Tagged With: 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, bank examinations, bank regulations, bank safety, banking rules, Community Banks, FDIC, federal reserve, financial regulation, OCC

FDIC Changes Reciprocal Deposit Rules for Banks Under New Housing Law

September 2, 2026 by Amanda Blankenship Leave a Comment

FDIC reciprocal deposit rules
The FDIC’s new reciprocal-deposit rule took effect September 1, 2026, increasing the amount qualifying banks can exclude from brokered-deposit treatment under a tiered calculation capped at $30 billion. The rule also expands which well-capitalized institutions can qualify for the exception. nmoyPhoto/Shutterstock

Banks participating in reciprocal deposit networks have new federal rules to follow after the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation implemented changes Congress made to how certain deposits are treated under banking regulations. The FDIC’s interim final rule took effect September 1 and implements Section 902 of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, which became law on July 11, 2026. The change primarily affects banks and their compliance teams rather than requiring customers to take immediate action. However, reciprocal deposits are an important tool that some banks use to help customers obtain FDIC insurance coverage for deposits exceeding the standard insurance limit at a single institution.

What Are Reciprocal Deposits?

A reciprocal deposit arrangement can allow a customer to place a large amount of money with one participating bank while portions of those funds are placed at other participating insured institutions. In return, the original bank receives deposits placed through the network by other institutions.

The arrangement can allow a customer to maintain a relationship with one bank while potentially receiving FDIC insurance coverage across multiple institutions, subject to applicable insurance rules and program terms. That’s particularly useful for businesses, municipalities and individuals holding deposits that exceed the standard FDIC insurance limit. The regulatory question for banks is whether those reciprocal deposits must be classified as “brokered deposits.” Federal law places additional restrictions and regulatory requirements on brokered deposits, particularly when an institution’s financial condition deteriorates.

The New Law Raises the Reciprocal Deposit Cap

Congress changed the reciprocal-deposit framework when the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act became law this summer. Under the new law and the FDIC’s implementing rule, qualifying “agent institutions” can exclude a larger amount of reciprocal deposits from being classified as brokered deposits. The new general cap uses a tiered calculation based on an institution’s total liabilities.

For the first $1 billion in liabilities, the calculation uses 50%. For liabilities above $1 billion and up to $10 billion, it adds 40% of that portion. For liabilities exceeding $10 billion, it adds 30% of that portion. The resulting general cap cannot exceed $30 billion.

That replaces the previous framework under which the general cap was generally the lesser of $5 billion or 20% of the institution’s total liabilities.

More Banks May Qualify as “Agent Institutions”

The rule also changes which banks can qualify for the reciprocal-deposit exception. Previously, an institution generally needed to be well capitalized and have a composite condition rating of 1 or 2 under the applicable supervisory rating system, among other potential ways to qualify.

The new law expands the definition to include institutions that are well capitalized and have a composite rating of 3. That change could allow additional institutions to make use of the reciprocal-deposit exception.

The FDIC’s rule also clarifies how institutions can requalify as agent institutions after circumstances change, such as a supervisory rating change, capital-category change, approval of a brokered-deposit waiver or reduction in reciprocal deposits below the applicable special cap.

What Does This Mean for Bank Customers?

For most consumers with ordinary checking and savings balances, the rule doesn’t require any immediate action. Its more direct impact is on financial institutions that participate in reciprocal-deposit networks and on customers with larger balances who use those services. Reciprocal-deposit networks can allow banks to retain relationships with customers whose deposits exceed the standard FDIC insurance limit by placing portions of the money with other participating insured institutions.

Customers shouldn’t assume, however, that simply participating in a reciprocal-deposit program automatically makes every dollar in every situation FDIC-insured. Deposit insurance depends on factors including account ownership category, how funds are placed and the institutions where deposits ultimately reside. Customers with large balances should review their specific arrangement and deposit-insurance coverage with their bank.

The FDIC Is Still Accepting Comments

Although the rule took effect September 1, it is an interim final rule, and the FDIC is requesting public comments. Comments must be received by October 1, 2026. The Federal Register notice says comments should reference RIN 3064-AG32 and can be submitted through the FDIC’s Federal Register publications page, by email or by mail.

The FDIC also says it will work with the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council to update bank Call Report instructions to reflect the statutory and regulatory changes.

For financial institutions using reciprocal-deposit networks, the September rule means compliance procedures and deposit classifications may need to be revisited. For ordinary depositors, the more important takeaway is understanding why these networks exist in the first place: they can allow qualifying customers to spread large deposits among multiple insured banks while continuing to work primarily through one institution.

What to Read Next

FDIC Publishes 2026 Risk Review Covering Funding, Interest Rate, and Credit Risks Facing Banks

7 FDIC Coverage Rules Couples Should Recheck Before Opening Trust or Joint Accounts

How Many CDs Can You Have at One Bank? What FDIC Rules Actually Allow

Headshot of Amanda Blankenship
Amanda Blankenship

Amanda Blankenship is the Chief Editor for District Media.  With a BA in journalism from Wingate University, she frequently writes for a handful of websites and loves to share her own personal finance story with others. When she isn’t typing away at her desk, she enjoys spending time with her daughter, son, husband, and dog. During her free time, you’re likely to find her with her nose in a book, hiking, or playing RPG video games.

Filed Under: news Tagged With: 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, banking, banking regulations, Banks, Brokered Deposits, Community Banks, deposit insurance, FDIC, FDIC insurance, Reciprocal Deposits, savings accounts

Follow Us

Search this site:

Recent Posts

  • Can My Savings Account Affect My Financial Aid? by Tamila McDonald
  • 12 Ways Gen X’s Views Clash with Millennials… by Tamila McDonald
  • What Advantages and Disadvantages Are There To… by Jacob Sensiba
  • Call 911: Go To the Emergency Room Immediately If… by Stephen Kanaval
  • 7 Weird Things You Can Sell Online by Tamila McDonald
  • 10 Scary Facts About DriveTime by Tamila McDonald
  • How to Avoid NJ Exit Tax by Jacob Sensiba

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework