• Home
  • About Us
  • Getting Finances Done
    • Hiring Advisors
    • Debt Management
    • Spending Plan
  • Insurance
    • Life Insurance
    • Health Insurance
    • Disability Insurance
    • Homeowners/Renters Insurance
  • Contact Us
  • Our Editorial Commitment

The Free Financial Advisor

You are here: Home / Archives for Department of Justice

Walmart Agrees to Pay $50 Million Over Allegations Its Pharmacies Filled Invalid Opioid Prescriptions

August 31, 2026 by Amanda Blankenship Leave a Comment

Walmart opioid settlement
Walmart has agreed to pay $50 million to resolve Justice Department allegations that its pharmacies filled thousands of invalid prescriptions for opioids and other controlled substances. The settlement also requires new monitoring and reporting safeguards, and DOJ says the resolved claims are allegations only with no determination of liability. QualityHD/Shutterstock

Walmart has agreed to pay $50 million to resolve federal allegations that its pharmacies illegally filled thousands of invalid prescriptions for opioids and other controlled substances, ending a major federal case that dates back nearly six years.

The Justice Department and Drug Enforcement Administration announced the settlement on August 28. The government had accused Walmart of violating the Controlled Substances Act through actions involving both individual pharmacists and members of the retailer’s corporate compliance team.

The settlement doesn’t include a determination that Walmart is liable for the alleged conduct. Walmart told Reuters that it was pleased to resolve the matter and said it would continue supporting its pharmacists and their work providing patient care.

DOJ Says Walmart Filled Prescriptions Despite Warning Signs

The government’s complaint was originally filed on December 22, 2020, and amended in 2022 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.

According to the Justice Department’s settlement announcement, the government alleged that Walmart had filled invalid prescriptions since June 26, 2013, through the knowing actions of individuals on its corporate compliance team and pharmacists working in its stores.

Federal officials alleged that members of Walmart’s compliance team knew certain prescribers were operating as “pill mills” but that invalid prescriptions written by those prescribers were filled anyway.

Walmart’s own pharmacists had raised concerns about problematic prescribers through thousands of internal “refusal-to-fill” forms, according to DOJ.

The government cited an internal email in which a compliance-team director said that rather than devoting additional effort to analyzing refusal-to-fill information, “[d]riving sales and patient awareness” was a better use of certain employees’ time.

Pharmacists Allegedly Encountered Red Flags

The government’s allegations weren’t limited to the actions of Walmart’s corporate compliance operation.

DOJ also alleged that Walmart pharmacists filled controlled-substance prescriptions they personally knew were invalid.

Federal officials said some prescriptions came from prescribers known as “pill mills,” while others presented warning signs that should have raised concerns about whether they were being issued for a legitimate medical purpose.

Those alleged red flags included dangerous combinations of opioids, combinations or “cocktails” involving opioids and non-opioid medications, repeated fills of high-dose and frequently abused opioids, and repeated requests to fill frequently abused controlled substances early.

The DEA said pharmacies have a responsibility to identify and prevent unlawful dispensing because illegitimate opioid prescriptions can put patients and communities at risk and undermine safeguards designed to prevent misuse and diversion.

Walmart Must Pay $50 Million and Adopt New Safeguards

The settlement requires Walmart to pay $50 million to resolve the federal allegations.

The retailer has also entered into a memorandum of agreement with the DEA establishing future requirements for how its pharmacies handle controlled substances.

Among those requirements, Walmart must establish a hotline that employees and patients can use to report suspected illegal dispensing of controlled substances.

The company must also proactively monitor dispensing patterns across its pharmacies to identify and address potentially illegal activity and establish a process for evaluating prescribers suspected of illegal prescribing.

DEA Assistant Administrator Cheri Oz said the agreement establishes compliance obligations intended to strengthen safeguards and help prevent similar problems in the future.

The Federal Case Had Previously Been Narrowed

The $50 million agreement resolves litigation that had been underway since 2020, although the government’s original case was broader than the claims ultimately remaining before the settlement.

In March 2024, a federal judge narrowed the lawsuit, dismissing claims involving Walmart’s alleged failure to report suspicious prescriptions to the DEA and pharmacists’ alleged failure to document certain prescription red flags.

The court allowed other claims to continue, including allegations that pharmacists dispensed prescriptions that Walmart compliance personnel knew were invalid and that pharmacists themselves knowingly dispensed invalid prescriptions.

Walmart did not admit liability as part of the $50 million resolution.

In a statement reported by Reuters after the settlement was announced, Walmart said it was pleased to resolve the matter and would continue supporting the work its pharmacists perform for patients.

The Settlement Ends the Case Without a Finding of Liability

The federal government characterized the agreement as part of its broader enforcement of laws governing pharmacies that dispense opioids and other controlled substances.

The case involved attorneys from the Justice Department’s Civil Division as well as U.S. Attorneys’ Offices in Delaware, North Carolina, Florida and New York.

For consumers, the settlement doesn’t mean that every opioid or controlled-substance prescription filled at a Walmart pharmacy was improper. The government’s allegations concerned specific dispensing and compliance practices over a period beginning in 2013.

The Justice Department also emphasizes an important legal distinction: the claims resolved by the settlement remain allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.

Going forward, the most visible consumer-facing change required by the agreement may be the new reporting hotline, which will allow both Walmart employees and patients to report suspected illegal dispensing of controlled substances.

What to Read Next

Should You Pay Off a 0% Credit Card Before the Promotional Rate Ends?

You Can Afford the Car Payment. Can You Afford the Car?

Your Credit Card Has a $30,000 Limit. How Much Should You Actually Be Willing to Spend?

Amanda Blankenship

Amanda Blankenship is the Chief Editor for District Media.  With a BA in journalism from Wingate University, she frequently writes for a handful of websites and loves to share her own personal finance story with others. When she isn’t typing away at her desk, she enjoys spending time with her daughter, son, husband, and dog. During her free time, you’re likely to find her with her nose in a book, hiking, or playing RPG video games.

Filed Under: news Tagged With: consumer safety, Controlled Substances, DEA, Department of Justice, healthcare, Opioid Prescriptions, Opioids, Pharmacy, prescription drugs, Walmart, Walmart Pharmacy

Chinese National Gets 15 Years in $92 Million Drug Money Laundering Scheme

August 19, 2026 by Amanda Blankenship Leave a Comment

$92 million money laundering scheme
A federal judge in the Western District of North Carolina sentenced Jianfei Lu to 15 years in prison for his role in a money laundering organization that prosecutors say processed more than $92 million in illicit funds. J. Michael Jones/Shutterstock

A Chinese national has been sentenced to 15 years in federal prison and ordered to forfeit $25 million for his role in a Chinese money laundering organization (CMLO) that processed more than $92 million in illicit funds, including proceeds from illegal drug importation and distribution in the United States, according to an official announcement from the U.S. Department of Justice.

Lu Was Sentenced to 15 Years in Federal Prison

Jianfei Lu, 31, of China, was sentenced in the Western District of North Carolina by U.S. District Judge Susan C. Rodriguez. In July 2025, Lu pleaded guilty to one count of money laundering conspiracy, two counts of money laundering to conceal illicit proceeds, and two counts of monetary transactions involving criminally derived property exceeding $10,000. As part of his guilty plea, Lu admitted to knowingly laundering between $25 million and $65 million in illicit funds and acknowledged that the money included drug trafficking proceeds.

According to court documents, Lu served both as a courier and a manager within the CMLO. As a courier, he personally collected drug trafficking proceeds from U.S.-based drug traffickers and deposited more than $20 million in bulk cash into shell company bank accounts using real and fake identities. As a manager, Lu coordinated directly with drug traffickers, dispatched other couriers to conduct bulk cash pickups and deposits, and procured fraudulent driver’s licenses used by couriers to deposit funds at major U.S. banks.

The Organization Laundered More Than $92 Million

The more than $92 million figure represents funds laundered by the broader organization, not money attributed solely to Lu. As part of his guilty plea, Lu admitted personally being responsible for laundering between $25 million and $65 million in illicit funds. Drug proceeds flowed primarily through networks connected to Mexico, according to the announcement.

The case was investigated by the DEA Charlotte District Office and the IRS Criminal Investigation Charlotte Field Office as part of the Homeland Security Task Force (HSTF), an interagency initiative established under Executive Order 14159. The HSTF is described by DOJ as a whole-of-government effort to investigate and prosecute criminal cartels, transnational criminal organizations, and related activity operating in the United States and abroad.

Prosecution was handled by trial attorneys from the Justice Department’s Criminal Division Money Laundering, Narcotics and Forfeiture Section, along with Assistant U.S. Attorneys from the Western District of North Carolina.

Why the Case Matters for the U.S. Financial System

This case is relevant to consumers and financial institutions because it involves the use of shell company bank accounts and fraudulent identification to move illicit cash through the U.S. banking system. Readers with questions about financial fraud or suspicious account activity should consult the relevant federal agencies, including the DEA, IRS-CI, or the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), for guidance specific to their situation.

What to Read Next

Treasury Proposes New Stablecoin Rules Under GENIUS Act — Here’s Who Could Be Affected

FTC Says Doxo Used Misleading Bill-Payment Ads and Hidden Fees — Company to Pay $2.1 Million

CMS Final Rule Ends Federal Medicaid and CHIP Funding for Certain Gender-Transition Care for Minors

Amanda Blankenship

Amanda Blankenship is the Chief Editor for District Media.  With a BA in journalism from Wingate University, she frequently writes for a handful of websites and loves to share her own personal finance story with others. When she isn’t typing away at her desk, she enjoys spending time with her daughter, son, husband, and dog. During her free time, you’re likely to find her with her nose in a book, hiking, or playing RPG video games.

Filed Under: news Tagged With: banking, DEA, Department of Justice, Drug Trafficking, Federal Court, Financial Crime, IRS Criminal Investigation, Money Laundering, North Carolina, Shell Companies

DOJ Settles for $400 Million with Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium Over Unpaid Healthcare Administrative Costs

July 22, 2026 by Amanda Blankenship Leave a Comment

Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium settlement
The Alaska Native Medical Center in Anchorage is operated in part by the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, which reached a $400 million settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice over unpaid healthcare administrative costs. Iljanaresvara Studio/Shutterstock

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has authorized a $400 million settlement with the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) to resolve a lawsuit over unpaid contract support costs under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA). The agreement ends litigation filed in 2021, in which ANTHC argued the federal government failed to reimburse administrative expenses tied to operating federally authorized healthcare programs. The settlement follows a landmark 2024 Supreme Court ruling that clarified tribes are entitled to certain contract support costs associated with third-party healthcare revenue, such as Medicare and private insurance payments. DOJ officials said the agreement is intended to provide greater certainty for tribal healthcare providers and the communities they serve.

Why the Lawsuit Was Filed

ANTHC administers healthcare programs that the federal government would otherwise operate for American Indians and Alaska Natives in Alaska. The consortium also manages the non-primary care functions of the Alaska Native Medical Center, one of the nation’s largest tribally operated hospitals. In its lawsuit, ANTHC argued it should have been reimbursed for administrative costs incurred while managing healthcare services funded in part through payments from Medicare and private insurers. Those expenses, known as contract support costs, help cover the overhead required to operate federally authorized healthcare programs.

Supreme Court Decision Changed the Legal Landscape

While the lawsuit was pending, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe that the federal government must reimburse qualifying contract support costs on third-party healthcare revenue when required under an ISDEAA agreement.

DOJ said that decision provided the legal framework that ultimately led to settlement negotiations with ANTHC. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said Congress intended tribes to be reimbursed for qualifying administrative expenses, while Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward said the agreement reflects a commitment to resolving litigation fairly and supporting Native communities. The Justice Department announced the settlement on July 21, 2026.

Broader Impact for Tribal Healthcare

The settlement could have implications beyond Alaska, as many tribal organizations nationwide operate healthcare programs under ISDEAA compacts. It reinforces the federal government’s reimbursement obligations following the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the law and may influence similar claims involving tribal healthcare funding.

While the agreement resolves this particular lawsuit, it also highlights the continuing importance of tribal self-governance in delivering healthcare services to Native communities. Organizations with questions about ISDEAA reimbursement requirements should consult the appropriate federal agencies or qualified legal counsel.

What to Read Next

HHS Seeks OMB Approval for Children and Families Program Monitoring Data Collection

Celsius Network Founders Ordered to Pay $16.5 Million to Resolve FTC Charges

SEC Proposes Rule on Electronic Delivery of Information Under Federal Securities Laws

Amanda Blankenship

Amanda Blankenship is the Chief Editor for District Media.  With a BA in journalism from Wingate University, she frequently writes for a handful of websites and loves to share her own personal finance story with others. When she isn’t typing away at her desk, she enjoys spending time with her daughter, son, husband, and dog. During her free time, you’re likely to find her with her nose in a book, hiking, or playing RPG video games.

Filed Under: news Tagged With: Alaska Native Medical Center, Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, ANTHC, Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, contract support costs, Department of Justice, federal settlement, healthcare funding, healthcare news, Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, ISDEAA, Native American health, Supreme Court, tribal healthcare

Follow Us

Search this site:

Recent Posts

  • Can My Savings Account Affect My Financial Aid? by Tamila McDonald
  • 12 Ways Gen X’s Views Clash with Millennials… by Tamila McDonald
  • What Advantages and Disadvantages Are There To… by Jacob Sensiba
  • 10 Tactics for Building an Emergency Fund from Scratch by Vanessa Bermudez
  • Call 911: Go To the Emergency Room Immediately If… by Stephen Kanaval
  • 7 Weird Things You Can Sell Online by Tamila McDonald
  • 10 Scary Facts About DriveTime by Tamila McDonald

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework